| FREE NEWSLETTERS | ![]() |
IT DIRECTORY | ![]() |
NEWS ALERTS | ![]() |
RSS | ![]() |
NEWS TIP-OFFS | ![]() |
ADD TO FAVOURITES | |
| VIRTUAL PRESS OFFICESTM | (011) 807 3294 | itnews@itweb.co.za | sales@itweb.co.za | Wed, 6 May 2009 |
Government policy on open source software use exists, but it still has a lot of work to do, says the State IT Agency (SITA).
This follows its signing of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Free Software and Open Source Foundation for Africa (Fossfa) to promote the use of free open source software in government.
Pumeza Ceza, manager of Foss advocacy at SITA, says the agency has prioritised assisting the government with its drive towards using open sourced software and fostering greater acceptance and use of free and open source software.
“The work that Fossfa has done – its various activities, certification programmes and work on policy – showed us it was best to use a bigger body. Right now we are looking at improving the open source policy and leverage on what we have already worked on.”
Ceza adds that a plan of action has been drawn up and the two organisations will focus on improving three key areas: policy, capacity-building and institutional support.
Daniel Mashao, CTO of SITA, says the MOU will promote the increased use of open source software among government departments, and increase the skills and capacity to introduce and manage open source software locally.
“We can, through the use of open sourced software, save the government money in terms of licensing fees, but furthermore foster the development of IT skills and, in particular, IT development skills in open source software in SA.”
Ceza notes government departments are migrating to open source solutions, but they still need assistance with skills development, and software and migration support from SITA.
“At a workshop on Foss implementation, held recently, we asked departments about their work and we found that over 90% of departments are working towards implementing Foss. There are a lot of initiatives going on and we found that most government departments' back-end systems are running open source.”
According to Mashao, a number of government departments are already at an advanced stage in introducing open sourced software into their departments. He notes that Seaparo Phalo, CIO of the Department of Arts and Culture, says his department is already at an “advanced stage of migration to open sourced software”.
Mashao adds the department has already migrated its mail servers, several desktops and business systems to Foss. In addition, pockets of migration are in progress, both in the national archives and national film archives sections, and all of the boardrooms already use the open source facilities.
The National Library of SA, which is partly funded by the Department of Arts and Culture, has also fully migrated its desktops to Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise, Mashao says. He adds that the Department of Science and Technology has also indicated it has progressive plans for back-end migrations, as well as other open source initiatives.
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments (6)
| hey Sis you keep on suprising me uyarocka joe serious its unbelievable | |
| I would agree with you regarding the benefits of open source at an OSS level and also at an infrastructure level. I disagree about open source savings on an applications level this excludes email and print servers. Access to good Java and PHP type application developers remain expensive but of course not at SAP resource rates. | |
| You propably were still on diapers when SAP came into the world stage. Dou you remember how much SAP engineers were getting paid? I will live that up to you to find out. Just a hint, the amounts were ridiculous but that did not stop companies from adopting SAP. The cost savings on Open Source are not on licence fees and labor alone. We`ve saved over 67% in cost by migrating to OSS. In our environment we can`t afford downtime and viruses, this is where OSS save us. Its been three years, printers are printing, we send e-mails and everything works. | |
| OK - Open source labour units costs are more expensive than Microsoft labour rates, if you have a problem with your open source solution who do you go to? Why did Nando's go back to Microsoft? What you win on licences you should lose on services, what about 3rd party patent costs etc, is free really free? | |
| Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise is open source but it is not free, so government is still paying for each installation. | |
|
It`s time to focus on service delivery to citizens and to create an IT infrastructure/framework which enables Government to accomplish this successfuly. Open source, closed source, mixed source - it`s all just a development model choice at the end of the day. What does matter is what software application provides the best solution and return on investment. Here`s hoping for a more pragmatic approach in future. |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
GijimaAst, listed on the JSE Securities Exchange, is a leading technology solutions and services company. It focuses on providing complete solutions in the mining, manufacturing, financial services and telecommunications industries as well as the public sector and parastatals.