| FREE NEWSLETTERS | ![]() |
IT DIRECTORY | ![]() |
NEWS ALERTS | ![]() |
RSS | ![]() |
NEWS TIP-OFFS | ![]() |
ADD TO FAVOURITES | |
| VIRTUAL PRESS OFFICESTM | (011) 807 3294 | itnews@itweb.co.za | sales@itweb.co.za | Mon, 11 May 2009 |
Telecoms operators are denying any responsibility in the SMS vote debacle that left the top two South African Idols finalists in limbo last week.
M-Net was compelled to call a joint win for Sasha Lee Davids and Jason Hartman in the popular reality show, after almost 600 000 valid SMS votes were delayed and not counted after the cut-off times.
M-Net's channel director for general entertainment, Theo Erasmus, says the broadcaster has initiated a technical investigation to determine the actual cause of the problem. He says the mobile operators have been co-operating with the broadcaster to discover the source.
“Somewhere between when the vote was sent by the cellphone user, and it being received by the wireless application service provider (WASP), some significant delays occurred. We have been able to track all delayed votes, but have not been able to determine the cause of the delay,” he adds.
He says the results of the investigation should be available within the “next day or so”, and the results will determine what the broadcaster will do. “We will have to wait for the outcome of the technical investigation and take it from there.”
The big three mobile operators were immediately fingered in the Idols debacle, following a recent outcry by customers who complained about network issues. Those complaints included delayed SMSes and dropped calls, which prompted the Independent Communications Authority of SA to start its own investigation into the matter.
No results have yet been released by the regulator, and most of the network operators said user trouble could be attributed to old SIM cards and incompatible handsets. MTN was the only operator that said it had significantly increased call volumes that could have been responsible for user delays.
Similarly, the operators have all said they are not responsible for the missing Idols SMS votes. “Vodacom would like to state that its network is not the cause of, nor responsible for, any voting irregularities in connection with M-Net's Idols competition,” says Vodacom's chief communications officer, Dot Field.
African telecoms giant MTN says it conducted a network investigation, which turned up no network irregularities that could account for the delayed messages. “After a full investigation, MTN can confirm that no delays were found in the MTN SMS system. All information has been submitted to M-Net for scrutiny by the appointed auditors for their findings,” says MTN's chief marketing officer, Serame Taukobong.
Cell C says only 2% of the votes were transmitted through its systems and all the SMSes went through without delay. “However, we have established that there was a delay in these SMSes being confirmed as received by the independent WASP, which could be attributed to the high call volumes as the competition reached its climax,” noted Steve Boiles, Cell C's executive head of networks.
The messages were delivered to WASP Grapevine Communications. The contact number listed on the company's Web site goes directly to a voicemail service. ITWeb could not reach the company at the time of publication.
From the Top 14 round of Idols to the final, viewers cast almost 8 million votes. In 2007, the entire show received same number of votes cast in total.
The final show saw around 2.4 million votes cast, split between call, SMS and Internet votes. Only 1.8 million had been counted by the final on 3 May. It is unclear how many of those were cast via SMS.
The telecoms operators usually experience similar problems during the Christmas season, when call and SMS volumes increase dramatically. Vodacom did not release figures for the Christmas period last year, however, it did indicate that its network behaved well over the season.
On New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, 26 million SMSes were sent from MTN handsets. The company said it had also handled the increased volume without trouble. Cell C did not have specific figures, but indicated SMS traffic increased by 80% over the season.
By Friday last week, Sasha Lee Davids and Jason Hartman were crowned joint winners of the coveted SA Idol competition. Sponsors have agreed to double the prize winnings.
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments (8)
| Cell phone operators service has left a lot to be desired over the past few months and seems to be getting worse; dropped calls, delayed sms's; surely they are the ones that should be under scrutiny ! | |
| So it is just a coincidence that the delay happens at the same time when most people in the Gauteng area are experiencing unexplained and unpredictable delays in the delivery of SMS messages? | |
|
[ BY DR. PHIL, 11 May 2009 ] — RECALL: Two weeks back the article here on Itweb with many users claiming frustration over dropped calls and delayed sms delivery.....so what's new. 1.) sms is not a reliable message delivery mechanism...its best effort mostly 2.) sms uses the same bandwidth and links used for signalling by cellular networks.... these links are optimised for signalling...they cost the cell operators according to bandwidth...and are not dimensioned for bulk sms handling ...especially not to a single number... to do that you need to do traffic engineering... something which definately is not done as rigorously for signalling links- an operator rather focusses on traffic engineering the data or voce carrying links and connections. Then one must ask... what about the other rounds?? How many other sms storms went unnoticed?? were there perhap two other finalists that should have been competing?? |
|
|
RECALL: Two weeks back the article here on Itweb with many users claiming frustration over dropped calls and delayed sms delivery.....so what's new. 1.) sms is not a reliable message delivery mechanism...its best effort mostly 2.) sms uses the same bandwidth and links used for signalling by cellular networks.... these links are optimised for signalling...they cost the cell operators according to bandwidth...and are not dimensioned for bulk sms handling ...especially not to a single number... to do that you need to do traffic engineering... something which definately is not done as rigorously for signalling links- an operator rather focusses on traffic engineering the data or voce carrying links and connections. Then one must ask... what about the other rounds?? How many other sms storms went unnoticed?? were there perhap two other finalists that should have been competing?? |
|
| Interesting, Grapevine is a Cape Town based company. Sasha Lee is from Cape Town. | |
|
would be interested to find out what the WASP has to say as they are very quiet in the whole matter. Press is very quick to point out at the mobile operators but i am sure the problem lies within Grapevine and MNET themselves. if MTN could handle 26million sms in a day surely a portion of 600K is negligible |
|
|
Firstly When the operator says they deliver 26 million SMS over new years and Christmas... its not to _1_ number! Cell C was the best performing operator during idols, because of lack of users! The amount of votes cast by SMS was made available in a press release. |
|
| Wheels on the buck go round and round, round and round, round and round, the wheels on the buck go round and round as we pass it all over town... | |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Do you feel that your telecommunications provider isn’t listening to you, or simply doesn’t understand your business? Click here for more info.
|
||||||||||||
|
CASE STUDIES |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||