| FREE NEWSLETTERS | ![]() |
IT DIRECTORY | ![]() |
NEWS ALERTS | ![]() |
RSS | ![]() |
NEWS TIP-OFFS | ![]() |
ADD TO FAVOURITES | |
| VIRTUAL PRESS OFFICESTM | (011) 807 3294 | itnews@itweb.co.za | sales@itweb.co.za | Thu, 25 Jun 2009 |
Microsoft's offer to ship Windows without a free browser isn't enough, says Opera. Linux ships free everything.
Having succeeded in forcing Microsoft to stop exploiting hapless European customers by including a free (and sub-standard) browser with its operating system, the EU's competition czar, Neelie Kroes, has mapped out the next step in the war on free stuff.
"I don't think what Microsoft announced is going to restore competition," Opera's CTO Hakon Wium Lie told Reuters.
Another of Finland's major exports, besides the Opera Web browser, is paper. Nokia built Finland's first pulp mill in 1865, and paper now represents a quarter of its export revenue. Finnish president Tarja Halonen has welcomed as "long overdue" the Dutch proposal to tax Internet users to subsidise struggling print newspapers. He says this is a perfect model for how the EU can do more to protect traditional markets and trade.
Nokia and Opera have called for a national strike to protest the destruction of Finland's export industries.
Kroes has responded by proposing a tax on Linux users, which will go towards subsidising European sellers of commercial software.
"Nobody disputes that Microsoft violated competition law by giving its users a free browser, Internet Explorer, with every copy of the Windows operating system," she explains. "Likewise, it is clear from experiences both in Europe and in the USA that the Internet is undermining the financial viability of traditional newspapers. Why, then, would any civilised society tolerate the Linux operating system?"
[Neelie] Kroes has responded by proposing a tax on Linux users, which will go towards subsidising European sellers of commercial software.
"Linux vendors are guilty of bundling a lot of free applications. Including sophisticated applications like OpenOffice and the Gimp at no extra charge is clearly anti-competitive behaviour, as established by the Microsoft precedent over Internet Explorer," Kroes says. "As if to thumb their noses at EU regulators, they even give away the operating system itself. How can real software companies be expected to compete on an equal footing in Europe?"
Jeremy Roche, chairman of the European Software Association (ESA), which is the industry's principal interface with European Union institutions, the media and the general public, has welcomed Kroes's proposal. He says this is another example of European best practice and co-operation across the business community.
"By giving people free software, open source vendors are violating their right to choose more expensive software made by European companies," says Roche. "Paid-for software is clearly superior, as any student of economics will tell you. So depriving users of the opportunity to pay amounts to exploitative business practice."
He adds that Europe's world-leading commercial software vendors, like SAP, Sage, Dassault Systèmes and Sopra, pay their workers well, and through their taxes sustain the welfare states that pay non-workers.
"They cannot be expected to compete against free software," Roche argues, "in much the same way that African farmers cannot compete against free food shipments from European donors. People who say that end-users benefit from access to free or inexpensive software are missing the big picture."
President Halonen says the hitherto unregulated Linux operating system – the core of which was written by a Finnish communist named Linus Torvalds – could have been a major export of Finland if it hadn't been free to distribute, modify and use.
"A tax will make sure that Linux users pay for their software," he says. "Users who were used to just clicking on software repositories to illegally download free software will have to think twice, or they will suffer the same fate that so-called 'peer-to-peer' music and film pirates face."
Roche says the ESA has already seeded the repositories of major distributions with fake copies of OpenOffice, the Gimp, Pidgin and QCad to track unauthorised users who exploit the anti-competitive behaviour of Linux vendors.
"Linux users, beware," he adds. "Your days of free-riding on the benefits of European socialism are over."
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments (20)
| obviously mr vegter has never used Linux and thinks that losing data, freezups and slow computing is the norm..... and now wants people to pay for the privilege of free computing... to protect an industry that kills trees ... no further comment needed ! | |
|
Haha! This brilliant piece clearly shows how brainless the competition law in Europe has become. How many of us cheered when Microsoft was punished and fined huge amounts for bundling free software with its OS? I hope this article makes people realise how easily this anti-end-user legislation that masquerades as competition law can be turned against any other company / IT practise that we all take for granted. Microsoft was only the beginning. Intel is next and then probably Google. And where will it stop? And many of us will sit around and let it happen and cheer the downfall of the big bad tech companies. Until of course they start taxing you for downloading the latest Linux distribution / free application, using the internet etc. Because once the precedent is set, as has been done with Microsoft, and we accept it we allow the bureaucrats free license to take things a step further every time. I think this article clearly illustrates the extremes this kind of moronic thinking can go to. Nice one! |
|
|
this should have been published on April 1 what a joke. "clicking on software repositories to illegally download free software " ... it's free, and legal. and the software is not included with Linux. It is software made by other 3rd parties. That was the issue with MS Antitrust, they were shipping their own products to detriment of others. Linux distributions do not ship their own products, they ship collections of software made by others. Source code is available, standards are complied with. No Antitrust. And no tax. not ever. What a useless article, spreading Fear Uncertainty and Doubt amongst the uninformed. |
|
| Whats next, tax on thinking? Tax new ideas? Should we not be paying tax on "free" relationship intercourse to pay for all those struggling prostitutes? | |
| Whats really frustrating, is that ITWeb and Ivo Vegter don`t seem to give a rats ass about supplying sources for their stories. Come on!! Interact with your readers... thats what this whole Internet thing is about... | |
|
List of sources? More research into the legal aspects involved and if any of these claims would ever hold up in a European court? Comment from the likes of Redhat, Novell, etc? |
|
| I have to agree - this seem absurd. What sources did you use to write this. It is as dumb as people trying to stop the internet from growing to keep libraries open.... | |
|
WTF are these people smoking? "Paid-for software is clearly superior". Is that why I can compromise a Windows server in about a tenth of the time it would take to do the same to a Linux server? Who are they to say what their market wants? Who are they to force people like me who write free software in my free time to not only better myself, but also perhaps eventually help someone who cant afford a billion dollar profit companies software? Are they (The Great European Conglomerate) actually saying that I cannot be a digital philanthropist because some fat bulge who used to make a killing from selling anti-virus software for viruses they produce in their own basement cannot eat at the Ritz anymore. Kamaan people - the digital hippy culture has cut 80% of the music industries bloated budgets and is doing the same to movies, and software, and frankly, everything else. We (the people who order the ones and zeroes) are taking the power back, and there is nothing you can do about it. So bleh! |
|
|
Was exactly my first thought! But beware, these are actually debates in Europe at the moment. Free market and Trade and performance based management are treated as evil words. From the Netherlands |
|
| Hee hee. I love it. The scary thing is that ideas like these are often seized on by brainless politicians and turned into policy. | |
|
I had to keep reminding myself I wasn't reading Hayibo. "By giving people free software, open source vendors are violating their right to choose more expensive software made by European companies," cracked me up. |
|
|
Hi, Can you give us some sources for this story? I've been looking around and can't find any quotes or references to it... it seems absurd... |
|
|
Any time you try to Tax a new industry to protect an old one, you are making a grave mistake. Imagine if Telephone users were taxed to protect the telegraph industry. Also, exactly how do they plan to tax linux? Do an NMAP scan for TCP fingerprints? Tax them at the till (*giggle*)? |
|
|
I had to check the date of this article, but no it is not April 1st. So, what can one say or do to combat the misinformation being put out by the ESA and others? I suspect I am going to be preaching to the choir, but ... What has Linux got to do with the financial viability of newspapers? It is modern information and communications technology, of which the Internet is part, that is killing the newspaper, not Linux. If people want to lay the blame for the growth of the Internet and the possible consequent demise of the newspaper industry at anybodies feet, it should probably be laid it at Microsofts, had they not included Internet Explorer for free in Windows the use of the internet might not have grown as it has. So the Finish paper industry is suffering because the newspaper industry is in decline. Is the decline in the newspaper industry really the probem, I have seen reports that say the use of paper has increased by factors ranging from 10 to 100 since the introduction of computers, and in particularly the PC, so why are they in trouble? Could it just be that they are producing the wrong product, if so change product or go the way of the Buggy Whip makers. But, is this proposal to regulate and tax free/opensource software really about the “unfair” competion as the ESA says, or the demise of traditional industries as the president of Finland says. Or is it as President Halonen says about the “the hitherto unregulated Linux operating system”, is the lack of government control and regulation of free and opensource software that is the real problem for these people? The growth of the internet has given the "common man" a venue for free speech and expression unparralled in history. In addition it has allowed the creation of the “citizen journalist”, who report what they see and hear without being restrained by the traditional news outlets political affiliations, the whim of the owner, or the restraining hand of the state. These freedoms are things that some politicians (and businesses) are terrified of. You can see just how frightened they are by looking at what some countries are doing to control the flow of information, Iran is the current example but there are many others. Perhaps what we are seeing here, in this attempt to tax and control free and opensource software, is the same fear. Free and/or opensource software cannot be easily controlled. Developers cannot be leaned upon to add that backdoor for the security service who want to monitor the users action. You cannot control the development by introducing laws, for if the development community doesnt like your law, they will move the centre of activity to some more ammenable juristriction. I hope that I am wrong, but if not then we had all better start saying no to such proposals, loudly and often JLA |
|
|
Since when are "students of economics" experts in these matters? Look how they messed things up, just using MS Excel! |
|
|
1st - Everything is done through a computer these days, and there are a lot of people out there that does not have the finances to buy a proper system. Linux, and other freeware, gives these people the chance to at least have a pc in their homes, and therefore enables children from poor families to learn, which in turn can lead to a career in the I.T. industry. 2 - Microsoft and other companies are making enough money as is. Why deprive anybody the right to free software, as they said, "paid for software is far superior", so why make any noise about it. 3- I believe in the fact that the person who developed linux had the choice to distribute it as a free O.S., or to sell it. |
|
|
Some people's logic defies logic: "Paid-for software is clearly superior, as any student of economics will tell you. So depriving users of the opportunity to pay amounts to exploitative business practice." Huh? Clearly superior FUD, and if users REALLY want to pay, they can always pay a donation. :( It seems this is about maintaining welfare states and not about free software per se. Is today April 1st? |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| COMMENT ON THIS |
||
| SEND TO A FRIEND |
![]() |
|
| QUICK |
![]() |
|
| PERSONAL ARCHIVE |
![]() |
|
| FOLLOW US ON TWITTER |
||
Broadlink is one of the new wireless operators making waves in the telecoms industry. It offers corporate users a licensed last-mile wireless alternative based on microwave technology, an option fast emerging as a viable alternative in the face of the cost and relatively slow roll-out of last-mile fibre in South Africa.
|
||||||||||||
|
CASE STUDIES |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||