| FREE NEWSLETTERS | ![]() |
IT DIRECTORY | ![]() |
NEWS ALERTS | ![]() |
RSS | ![]() |
NEWS TIP-OFFS | ![]() |
ADD TO FAVOURITES | |
| VIRTUAL PRESS OFFICESTM | (011) 807 3294 | itnews@itweb.co.za | sales@itweb.co.za | Tue, 15 Sep 2009 |
Iowa senator Tom Harkin, newly empowered to investigate health matters as chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labour and Pensions Committee, promised to probe deeply into any potential links between cellphone use and cancer.
Harkin, who took over the committee earlier this month after the death of Massachusetts senator Edward Kennedy, said he was concerned no one has been able to prove cellphones do not cause cancer.
"I'm reminded of this nation's experience with cigarettes. Decades passed between the first warnings about smoking tobacco and the final definitive conclusion that cigarettes cause lung cancer," Harkin said.
Cellphones, used by an estimated 275 million people in the US and four billion worldwide, use radio waves. Years of research have failed to establish any clear link between their use and several kinds of cancer, including brain tumours.
Recent worries have been raised by the Environmental Working Group, an activist group, and epidemiologist Devra Lee Davis of the University of Pittsburgh, who has written a book alleging the government has overlooked many potential sources of cancer.
Harkin called a hearing of the Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Labour, Health and Human Services, and Education to look into the questions. "I will pursue this beyond this panel, with NIH [the National Institutes of Health]," Harkin said after the hearing.
He noted the appropriations committee did not have jurisdiction over the Food and Drug Administration or the Federal Communications Commission, but said the health committee he now chairs does.
A staffer said the senator became concerned by a report from the Environmental Working Group showing that radio wave emissions vary from one cellphone brand and model to another; as well as some reports suggesting there might be a link.
Linda Erdreich of science and engineering firm Exponent in New York said 50 years worth of evidence had failed to show that cellular phones can cause cancer.
"This part of the spectrum is known as non-ionizing radiation," she told the hearing, explaining that this means radio waves cannot damage the DNA in cells.
But Pennsylvania senator Arlen Specter pressed her on this, asking her repeatedly whether science had conclusively proved there was no connection. "Your statement that it is hard to prove a negative is right on," Erdreich replied.
"What comes through to me is that we just don't know what the answer is," said Specter, a cancer survivor who said he avoids white flour and sugar in case it might feed tumours.
![]() |
|
|
Copyright 2010 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication and redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. |
![]() |
POST YOUR COMMENT
Comments (1)
| It is intresting to listen this banter I use a cell phone and and lost a business partner to cancer who died with two large golf ball size tumours on the right hand side of his head, anecdotal it might be but theres no smoke without fire. There is cell degeneration from RF energy and it is cummulative, we use microwave to cook our food, continued use of a cell phone where the SAR rating is elevated, stressful life style, chalenged immune system and poor eating habits added with the possibility of smoking place candidates in line to become a statistic. So one cannot put the blame solely at the door of the cell phone per say. | |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Do you feel that your telecommunications provider isn’t listening to you, or simply doesn’t understand your business? Click here for more info.
|
|
CASE STUDIES |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||