Subscribe
  • Home
  • /
  • TechForum
  • /
  • Reducing fraud costs has significant impact on bottom line

Reducing fraud costs has significant impact on bottom line

By Bill Hoggarth
Johannesburg, 13 Jun 2003

While industry continues to develop more sophisticated techniques to counter technology fraud, fraudsters themselves evolve accordingly. As soon as one loophole is plugged, high tech hoodlums simply find another.

Companies therefore need to tackle fraud on more than one level. They should engender an anti-fraud culture, employ analytical tools to prevent it, and in cases of detected fraud, bring in investigators.

"A mere one percent reduction in fraud-related costs can typically result in a 10 percent increase in profit margins," says Bill Hoggarth, managing director of SAS Institute, leaders in business intelligence. "An organisation would have to significantly increase sales or reduce overhead or staff numbers to achieve the same kind of bottom line benefit."

The incidence of fraud in SA is at an all-time high, reflecting global trends of rising fraud.

SAS' UK office has upgraded its estimate for total fraud in the UK from lb14 billion to lb18 billion annually, or almost US$30 billion. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) in the United States estimated fraud in 2002 at 6 percent of total revenues, which translates to losses of approximately $600 billion, or about $4,500 per employee.

"There is huge concern here about international fraud syndicates taking advantage of our first class banking facilities, and making SA a base for their activities," says Hoggarth. "Fraud committed by employees within SA companies also remains a massive problem, with up to 80 percent of all fraud reported by companies perpetrated from within."

Dishonest employees can severely damage the organisation. They are inside the security fence and know what company policies and procedures are capable of trapping. They also have the advantage of knowing exactly when the vulnerabilities in an infrastructure are.

"With the global growth of the Internet and the increasing connectivity of business data in digital form, fraudsters have more avenues and access points than ever before," says Hoggarth. "It has become increasingly difficult for companies to protect themselves against their efforts."

White-collar thieves can be very creative. They are increasingly using valid account information to impersonate customers or abusing 'trusted supplier' relationships by subtly inflating invoices and billing organisations for goods or services never received. Employees are also bypassing security protocols from within the company to hide embezzling activities.

Increasing reliance on technology in business transactions and identity verification will enable even greater scope for fraud.

Fraud is difficult to stop because no company wants to admit - even within its own walls - that it is vulnerable. It results in bad press and, for publicly traded companies, it can have a negative effect on share value.

Even when fraud is discovered, prosecution is not always the most financially appealing option because sentencing tends to be light and compensation awards low compared to the damages of the crime itself.

According to Hoggarth, fraud prevention is therefore the best option.

Companies can use analytical tools and software solutions to detect and prevent fraud. Patterns and anomalies become more readily identifiable, and suspicious activities can be isolated, measured and tracked.

Amazon.com, for example, chose SAS as the foundation of its fraud detection system. Jaya Kolhatkar, Amazon.com's director of fraud detection explains that its implementation of SAS has greatly reduced the cases of fraud on the Amazon.com site.

"In the first six months of SAS implementation our fraud rates were cut by 50 percent," Kolhatkar says.

"Business intelligence can identify and measure a company's exposure to potential fraudulent transactions," says Hoggarth. "It can help to assess the likelihood of any given transaction being fraudulent. It also helps to model what action the company can take if what may be a fraudulent transaction is discovered."

It is vital for organisations to capture decent data. "Only with clean, accurate data can they measure their exposure to fraud, and then decide what to do about it," Hoggarth adds.

Finally, a company's anti-fraud strategy should be followed through by bringing in professional investigators to work on cases of detected fraud.

Organisations should use effective sanctions, including appropriate legal action, against people committing fraud, whether they are customers, employees or business partners.

Share

SAS

SAS is the market leader in providing a new generation of business intelligence software and services that create true enterprise intelligence. SAS solutions are used at more than 39,000 sites -- including 90% of the Fortune 500 -- to develop more profitable relationships with customers and suppliers; to enable better, more accurate and informed decisions; and to drive organisations forward. SAS is the only vendor that completely integrates leading data warehousing, analytics and traditional BI applications to create intelligence from massive amounts of data. For more than 25 years, SAS has been giving customers around the world The Power to Know(r). For more information, visit http://www.sas.com/sa.

Editorial contacts

Lianne Osterberger
Citigate ICT PR
(011) 804 4900
Coral de Villiers
SAS Institute
(011) 713 3400