King III is here. As of 1 July a whole new raft of recommendations with a whole lot of implications for IT became your, yes, your, problem.
The world's data centres are going virtual, as are some of its desktops. The benefits are well known, but what about the pitfalls?
When it comes to disasters, once is more than enough, which makes the holes most companies have in BC&DR plans a real problem.
Has the corporate world hopped onto the social networking bandwagon? And more importantly, why should it?
IT asset management deals with IT assets, right? And information is an IT asset, right? Or wrong?
Too many companies fail to make the distinction that enterprise architecture is about how a business is structured, not about IT.
Going green needs to be done sensibly and sustainably or not at all.
Competition is here. Long live competition, or not, as it may well be.
The network is the centre of social and economic activity worldwide. How well are you looking after yours?
We live in an increasingly connected world, and Web 2.0 technologies are only making it more so. But should corporates care?
If SA can't compete on price, its contact centres need focus
With the move to virtualise anything that whirs or beeps, the data centre is becoming ever more important.
With VANS finally being allowed to self-provide, is there still a case for municipal broadband?