Subscribe

Smart agriculture is ground-breaking, but...

The unspoken factors that influence the adoption of smart agriculture in SA, by Dr Justy Range, Business Development Manager, Freshmark Systems.


Johannesburg, 30 Jul 2018
Dr Justy Range, Business Development Manager, Freshmark Systems.
Dr Justy Range, Business Development Manager, Freshmark Systems.

Smart technology is a hot topic these days, and notably so in agriculture, where there are many use cases, from drones and remote water monitoring, to soil analysis, animal tracking, irrigation control, and more.

While the potential value is exciting, it's important to remember these kinds of technological applications are part of a much more complex socioeconomic picture, especially in South Africa, says Dr Justy Range, Business Development Manager, Freshmark Systems.

Congested value chain

One could argue that all agricultural sectors are being infiltrated by smart tech, a trend that's being driven by the sheer scale of innovation entering this sector. I foresee an extremely congested and competitive environment surrounding smart agriculture in the years to come.

Established service providers across the board are introducing a tech component to their product offering. From logistics to irrigation, companies are building on the technology wave to market, differentiate and enhance their products, in many instances duplicating functionality.

The ease with which one can enter this market further compounds this effect. Cheap and accessible technology solutions create a natural access point for small, localised companies to develop and offer solutions to growers. This mix of small to large solution providers are facing the challenges of marketing to a broad and geographically dispersed installation base; a struggle that consequently leads to strong regionally focused applications.

The focus will ultimately fall on the larger established growers to drive broader value chain adoption. These growers can experiment with solutions and leverage scale to achieve a return on investment.

Impact on the industry

After the dust settles on these new developments, one of two scenarios could emerge:

1. An open and collaborative environment

In a case like this, we would see the adoption and use of industry standards to integrate both vertically and horizontally within the value chain. The benefits of this could reach further than just the farms themselves. They could spill over into society, leading to improved transparency and accessibility within food distribution. This is because unlocking and bringing a diverse mix of growers, service providers and customers together requires a collaborative open philosophy around data gathering, integration, and sharing.

2. A closed system integrated into a specific value chain

This scenario could effectively monopolise the benefits from smart tech, with little direct benefit to the broader industry and society as a whole. Access to information comes at a high cost within closed systems. One-dimensional integrated supply chains would effectively lock those who are not directly invested in the system out of it.

Without a transparent value chain, knowledge vacuums emerge that are exploited by middlemen. This makes processes unnecessarily non-transparent, complicated and expensive.

To unlock the value of information sharing in closed systems, statutory interventions are ultimately required. Take the recent case of Grain SA, an industry that is a large-scale adopter of technology, as an example. The statutory amendments for the reporting of maize imports and exports aims to extract more timeous and accurate information further up the value chain. But, when it comes to the broader value chain, additional measures are required to unlock transparency for the grower.

The same trend is visible in other agricultural value chains too.

Within a closed, proprietary and fragmented technology landscape, technology could actually strengthen monopolies. It's only when the various stakeholders come together with the intent to plan and improve the industry as a whole that we'll move closer to the broader benefits that smart tech offers.

Integration in Africa

If we're to make the most of smart agriculture, integration is vital. Without it, there is no real end-to-end benefit or visibility for anyone. This is perhaps the greatest strength of industry 4.0 entering agriculture.

Increased adoption will improve aspects like:

* Transparency;
* Risk management;
* Stock management; and
* Price discovery.

Smart technology can play a key role in the social and economic development of the agricultural sector in Africa. But, ironically, increased adoption could also hurt small-scale agriculture.

Larger farms in developed countries are likely to exploit economies of scale to increase the effectiveness of their farming operations further. This could decrease the relative competitiveness of small-scale growers, effectively pushing them out. This is something that Africa can't afford.

Value chains in developing countries are also severely constrained and limited in terms of infrastructure and, as a result, are often dysfunctional. So, before we turn to technology as the 'silver bullet', it's important to address some of the basic challenges many local farmers face.

Beyond smart technology

Lastly and importantly, the danger with the concept of 'smart' in agriculture is that technology is usually narrowly defined as ICT alone. But, smart agriculture can also be looked at in a broader context of seed, production, mechanisation, irrigation, logistics, farming methods, and more.

If you step back a bit, you'll see that broader approaches like precision farming, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are the real disruptors on the horizon. It's when algorithms are introduced that we'll see the real 'thinking' farms of the future.

The ability to better monitor and use data points across all farming activities will assist in improving planning and management effectiveness across the board. Smart devices will play a part in achieving this.

Volatile production environments, costs and prices are still the most significant challenges in agriculture. It's the farmer who is both smart and responsive, and an industry that works together for the sake of the broader societal good, that will survive this new technological age of agriculture. In other words: to respond to this challenge, we need a broader approach towards being 'smart'.

Share

Editorial contacts

Renee Schonborn
Little Black Book PR
(083) 600 3121
renee@littleblackbookpr.co.za