About
Subscribe

The biggest cross-sell ever

Microsoft`s Windows XP is not just an operating system. It is a marketing campaign and a service that is marginalising its competitors, and others.
By Jason Norwood-Young, Contributor
Johannesburg, 01 Nov 2001

MicrosoftWindows XP`s launch was a most entertaining event. For those who didn`t attend the gathering at Monte Casino, you missed out on a spectacular light show, a woman dressed as a large arrow being lowered from the ceiling and jerked around the stage, and a very long demonstration of the multimedia capabilities of XP.

Microsoft`s moral obligation in a position of power is to not favour one partner over another for marketing reasons.

Jason Norwood-Young, Technology editor, ITWeb

What the show, and the advertising and promotion around the show, could have done without, was the distinct favouring of specific Microsoft , to the detriment of others. Intel seemed to get more out of Microsoft`s multibillion-rand campaign than Microsoft itself. The Pentium 4 logo sat in every print advert and had a prominent place in the presentation.

While AMD was invited to the party, no mention was made of the new Athlon, which has been named XP itself - supposedly for "extreme performance". I even hear that the local Microsoft representatives were a little embarrassed at sidelining AMD to such an extent, but instructions from on high, purportedly prompted by a donation to XP`s launch campaign, put Intel in the spotlight.

Microsoft clearly holds the prominent position in the market, and I believe that Windows XP will cement its position as it is clearly a good, user-friendly, robust operating system. Yet with such force in the marketplace come some responsibilities. One of those responsibilities is making sure you don`t stomp on market players that are trying to support you.

Moral obligation

While SA does not have anti-monopoly legislation, and while Microsoft does not, to my knowledge, fall short in the anti-competitive legislation, its moral obligation in a position of power is to not favour one over another for marketing reasons. If AMD`s chips were inferior to Intel`s, Microsoft would be justified in its marginalisation of this partner. I do not believe this to be the case. AMD has clearly closed the gap with Intel and often outshines its large competitor.

Other software players that will take a knock from XP include Real Media (due to the packaging of Windows Media Player with the OS); Opera and Netscape, thanks to Microsoft`s continued insistence of including IE in Windows and even making its MSN pages IE-only for a short period; Sun Microsystems, since XP does not come with a Java virtual machine; and a host of niche software and service vendors that will be ousted by Microsoft`s Movie Maker, Instant Messenger, Hotmail integration, Outlook Express and MSN Explorer.

The link between Passport and Windows XP - encouraging users a little too strongly to sign up for Microsoft Passport (part of the Hailstorm project) - will threaten those who aren`t Microsoft competitors. Once this service gets into full swing, e-commerce providers not in the programme could be seriously marginalised, with XP users naturally preferring to transact with Passport-compliant vendors. Passport alone is probably the greatest medium- to long-term threat for Microsoft`s competitors, and sadly is also a threat to non-competitors - companies just trying to survive on the Internet.

Share