Subscribe

Balancing risk vs reward in no-code, low-code

Despite the many benefits no-code, low-code and open source tools offer, there are downsides to these tools if they are not managed well.
Monique Williams
By Monique Williams, Southern Africa regional sales manager for Hyland Software.
Johannesburg, 30 Jun 2022

The business case for low-code and no-code tools is a compelling one: unlocking speed, agility and competitive advantage without having to recruit more developers and undergo extensive development and customisation projects.

An approach to application development with no-code and low-code tools uses platform-based visual design elements – such as drop-down menus and checkboxes − to quickly develop, change and deliver business applications with minimal to no hand-coding.

For developers under pressure to deliver on digital transformation and innovation, no-code and low-code tools are the solution. In fact, Forrester expected low-code platforms to account for 75% of application development by the end of 2021, up from 44% in 2020.

However, with a plethora of low-code, no-code and open source tools available, organisations wanting to take advantage of the benefits are also confronted with certain challenges and concerns. Key among these is the issue of trust – including the software’s security and stability.

Benefits and priorities

A recent IDC white paper sponsored by global content services provider Hyland, titled “Navigating software solution delivery in a digitally transformed world”, found that security was the top concern among organisations looking to low-code, no-code and open source software.

Other top concerns for low-code software were stability, innovation and user experience, while top concerns around open source included compatibility, stability and user experience.

Organisations said low-code software benefits include a reduced risk of vendor lock-in, ease of integration with existing software, improved developer productivity, faster time to innovation and speed of deployment, attracting and retaining developers, and lower pressure on software budgets.

Uncontrolled no-code and low-code adoption could cause massive shadow IT sprawl.

The research found that respondents felt the top benefits of open source software, among other things, were improved productivity, ease of integration with other open source environments, improved time to innovation, the ability to leverage open source communities as supply and distribution channels, and access to community-driven innovation.

Another important benefit of no-code, low-code and open source tools is that they help organisations innovate despite a lack of access to skilled developers. According to IDCʼs Worldwide Developer Forecast, the worldwide shortage of full-time developers will increase from 1.4 million in 2021 to 4 million in 2025.

IT is acutely aware of this shortage amid growing pressure to innovate: IDC’s research found that 31% of IT respondents planned to address developer skills shortfalls by using low-code, no-code and robotic process automation, versus only 17% of business respondents. 36% of IT respondents planned to use more open source tools to overcome the skills constraints, versus only 20% of business respondents.

Risks and concerns

Despite the many benefits no-code, low-code and open source tools offer, there are certain downsides to these tools if they’re not managed well.

IDC notes that as the enterprise technology landscape grows more complex and myriad new tools are added, organisations need to consider their security posture each time a new piece of software is added to the environment. IDC finds that in the same way there is a learning curve to using new types of software around securing it.

The tools and platforms may speed up deployment times, but not all of them are simple enough for the citizen developer to deploy unassisted. Integration with organisational data and systems can prove challenging: as noted by KPMG, low-code and no-code do not mean low skill.

This may be the reason why most end-users of low-code development tools are not business users at this stage ─ 69% of IDC survey respondents said software developers are the primary users of the tools, which allow developers to more quickly customise and deliver software that business teams need.

Uncontrolled no-code and low-code adoption could also cause massive shadow IT sprawl and a lack of visibility into the tools accessing corporate data, unless the organisation provides an approved low-code platform and issues guidelines on how to use it.

Balancing the risks and rewards of no-code, low-code and customised open source tools requires new strategies and controls across the organisation.

An enterprise low-code application platform supports rapid application development and deployment with the simplified one-button deployment of applications. Using a low-code rapid application development platform allows businesses to configure solutions more easily, minimise IT sprawl and ensure content and process management capabilities are natively available to all configured applications and users.

A low-code rapid application development platform minimises the need for costly custom coding and multiple point solutions from different vendors, allowing developers to configure rather than code with intuitive tools like checkboxes, radio buttons and drop-down menus. However, it is critical that the app-building platform can access and use all the latest data from the company’s entire content and application ecosystem.

Gartner expected low-code application platforms to remain the largest component of the low-code development technology market through 2022, increasing nearly 30% from 2020 to reach $5.8 billion in 2021.

Noting that most large organisations would have adopted multiple low-code tools in some form by year-end 2021, Gartner said organisations would turn to low-code technologies that support application innovation and integration as they embrace the tenets of a composable enterprise.

Share